CTN PRESS

CTN PRESS

NEWS & BLOGS EXCLUCIVELY FOR INFORMATION TO ENGINEERS & VALUERS COMMUNITY

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION IS MANDATORY FOR BUILDERS: SUPREME COURT

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION IS MANDATORY FOR BUILDERS: SUPREME COURT

 

The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that the builder of a housing complex remains legally bound to get ‘completion certificate’ for the structure even if the beleaguered EMI-paying flat owners take possession of their houses prior to issuance of such mandatorily required certificate.

The relief for 36 flat buyers in a Kolkata housing complex, litigating since 2006 against RNR Enterprise builder, came from a bench of Justices SR Bhat and Dipankar Datta, who criticised the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) for saying that the flat buyers should get completion certificate for the structure as they took possession prior to the authorities issuing the certificate.

The SC said, “True it is, the appellants (flat buyers) ought not to have taken possession without the completion certificate. However, that was not a valid ground not to direct the respondents (builder) to apply for and obtain the completion certificate as required by law.”

Under the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, it is the obligation of the builder to apply for completion certificate. “It is no part of the flat owner’s duty to apply for a completion certificate,” it said. The housing complex is on Kailash Ghosh Road.

The flat owners had also complained that the builder promised many amenities but failed to provide these, including a playground, community hall and a lake on adjacent land, which never came into existence. The builder had said that as the flat buyers had taken possession of their properties on ‘as is where is’ basis, they are not entitled to any of the amenities.

The SC said the flat owners, by registering their properties, have not forfeited any right over the promised amenities which were not provided by the builder. “It was the duty of the NCDRC to set things right,” it said.

“We are constrained to observe that the respondents (builder) have been let off by the NCDRC in a manner contrary to law. This is an appropriate case where the complaint of the appellants (flat owners) ought to be remitted to the NCDRC for taking a relook into the complaint in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly,” the bench ordered. However, it also faulted the flat owners for taking possession even before the builder could get the competition certificate for the housing complex. “Undoubtedly, they have also been on the wrong side of law by taking possession of their respective flats without the completion certificate, whatever might be the compulsion,” the SC said.

 



source link:

 

FOR MANY MORE  UPDATES AVAILABLE CLICK BELOW 

CLICK THE BELOW LINK TO READ THE COMPLETE CONTENTS

SOME CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE FOR GOLD SUBSCRIBERS ONLY.

Join us as a GOLD SUBSCRIBER and get access to read important books.

CEV LIBRARY GOLD SUBSCRIPTION

KIND ATTENTION
We are going to close all what’s groups of CEV soon due to difficulties in posting information or message in more than 5 groups of CEV at a time.

All future posts of empanelment notices & professional importance will be shared on
1.
https://t.me/+dbHNkNO22xsyYTY1
2.
www.valuerworld.com
3. The Twitter handle of CEV India
https://twitter.com/cevindia?t=XbqlvnwUVz1G3uPgs749ww&s=09
after closing the groups.
All members of these groups are requested to register themselves at the following link immediately for Getting all related timely updates

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top