ACTION TAKEN AGAINST VALUERS FOR DIFFERENT VIOLATIONS OF RULES & REGULATIONS
For Professionals in Engineering, Valuation, and Land Administration
Action Taken Against Valuers for Violations of Rules and Regulations: A Case Study Approach Under Section 247 of the Companies Act, 2013
Introduction
Valuers play a pivotal role in determining the economic value of assets, whether they are tangible or intangible. In India, the profession of valuation is governed under Section 247 of the Companies Act, 2013, and further supported by the Registered Valuers and Valuation Rules, 2017. These rules are intended to ensure that valuation practices are carried out with integrity, transparency, and professionalism.
However, violations of these standards have resulted in strict actions by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which oversees the registration, regulation, and oversight of valuers.
This article discusses the different types of violations under these regulations and examines the actions taken against valuers, using case studies to highlight key infractions and regulatory responses, with certain assumptions.
Legal Framework: An Overview of Section 247 and the Valuation Rules
Section 247 of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates that a company can only conduct valuations by an individual or firm that is a registered valuer with a recognized professional body. The Registered Valuers and Valuation Rules, 2017 lay down detailed guidelines for the registration, conduct, and professional standards for valuers. The rules prescribe specific qualifications, procedures, and conduct requirements to ensure the credibility of the valuation process.
Some key features of the law include:
-
Registration Requirement: Only registered valuers can be appointed to perform valuations under the Companies Act.
-
Code of Conduct: Valuers must adhere to a strict code of conduct, ensuring that the valuation is independent, transparent, and impartial.
-
Disciplinary Mechanisms: In case of violations, the IBBI can initiate actions against errant valuers, including suspension or cancellation of registration.
Types of Violations and Regulatory Response
Violations by valuers typically fall into one of several categories: negligence in valuation practices, lack of independence, failure to adhere to ethical standards, misrepresentation of asset values, or failure to comply with regulatory guidelines. Below, we analyze some real-world case studies that highlight how IBBI has acted to uphold the integrity of the valuation profession.
Case Study 1: Negligence in Conducting Valuation
Incident:
A valuer was found to have conducted a valuation of a company’s fixed assets without adequately inspecting the assets in question. The valuation was done using old financial data and ignoring substantial changes in market conditions. This led to an overstatement of the assets’ value, which was later used in corporate restructuring, resulting in financial misreporting.
Regulatory Action:
Upon investigation, determined that the valuer had not followed the prescribed procedures for asset inspection and had relied on outdated data. Consequently, suspended the valuer’s registration for a period of six months, imposed a penalty for negligence, and ordered the firm to re-assess the valuation under the supervision of an IBBI-approved valuer.
Lesson Learned:
The IBBI’s stringent actions underline the importance of diligence in performing valuations. Valuers must ensure that all aspects of the valuation process, including on-site inspections and data relevance, are properly adhered to.
Case Study 2: Lack of Independence and Conflict of Interest
Incident:
A registered valuer, who was appointed to determine the fair value of a company during an insolvency process, was found to have prior business dealings with the promoter group of the company in question. The valuers were suspected of biasing their assessment to benefit the promoters, which would influence the resolution process.
Regulatory Action:
After receiving a complaint, stakeholders launched an inquiry and found that the valuer had indeed violated the principle of independence as required by the Valuation Rules. In response, the valuer’s registration was revoked and a ban on their future registration for a period of five years.
Lesson Learned:
It reinforces the requirement for independence and impartiality in valuation work. Valuers must avoid situations where there is a conflict of interest, as even the appearance of bias can undermine the valuation’s credibility and the integrity of the process.
Case Study 3: Failure to Adhere to Ethical Standards
Incident:
A registered valuer was found to have used manipulative techniques in reporting the valuation of an industrial property. Instead of employing recognized methodologies and approaches, the valuer overstated the asset’s worth to artificially inflate the company’s book value for the purpose of raising additional capital.
Regulatory Action:
Upon investigation, determined that the valuer had violated multiple provisions of the Code of Conduct outlined in the Valuation Rules. As a result, the valuer was suspended for two years, during which time the firm had to undergo a retraining program on ethical valuation practices.
Lesson Learned:
This case highlights the critical importance of ethical conduct in the profession. The honesty of a valuer is not just a matter of personal integrity, but also fundamental to the proper functioning of financial markets.
Case Study 4: Misrepresentation of Valuation for Personal Gain
Incident:
In a high-profile case, a valuer misrepresented the valuation of an intellectual property (IP) asset to inflate its value in a merger and acquisition (M&A) deal. The inflated valuation was used to justify a higher purchase price, benefiting the selling party at the expense of the acquirer.
Regulatory Action:
Upon receiving a complaint and conducting an inquiry, found that the valuer had intentionally misrepresented the asset’s worth. The registration of the valuer was canceled, and the valuer was permanently banned from practicing in the valuation profession.
Lesson Learned:
This case serves as a reminder that misrepresentation for personal gain or financial benefit is a severe violation and is treated with utmost seriousness. Valuers must remain transparent and truthful in all their assessments.
Key Takeaways and Regulatory Trends
-
Adherence to Standards: Valuers must be thorough in their work, follow prescribed methodologies, and ensure that their valuations are based on current, accurate data.
-
Independence is Critical: Valuers must be free from conflicts of interest and must not allow external factors to influence their assessments.
-
Ethical Conduct: The profession demands the highest standards of integrity. Violations of ethical guidelines, such as manipulation or misrepresentation, will lead to severe consequences.
-
Continuous Education and Compliance: The IBBI encourages valuers to engage in continuous professional development, ensuring that they remain up-to-date with evolving industry standards.
Solution: Upholding the Integrity of the Valuation Profession
The role of valuers in the financial and corporate ecosystem is indispensable. They ensure transparency, fairness, and trust in transactions involving significant assets. However, when this role is compromised, the ripple effects can be detrimental to both businesses and the broader economy.
The actions taken by the IBBI against violators serve as an essential reminder that regulatory bodies will not tolerate breaches of the law and that transparency, accuracy, and professionalism are the cornerstones of the valuation practice. For professionals and aspirants in the field of valuation, understanding and adhering to these regulations is crucial for maintaining not just personal credibility but also the health of the broader financial ecosystem.
This article aims to shed light on the regulatory actions taken by the IBBI and serves as a critical reminder for current and aspiring professionals in the valuation industry to adhere to the highest standards of conduct and practice.
TO READ ALL CASE STUDIES, CLICK ON THE BUTTON BELOW
