COMPARISON OF INDIAN VALUATION RULES WITH INTERNATIONAL VALUATION STANDARDS

Comparison of Indian Valuation Rules with International Valuation Standards

Valuation plays a crucial role in financial markets, corporate finance, and investment management. Accurate and standardized valuation practices are essential for ensuring transparency, consistency, and fairness in financial reporting. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of Indian valuation rules with international valuation standards, highlighting key differences and similarities.

Overview of Valuation Standards

Indian Valuation Standards (IVS)

Indian Valuation Standards (IVS) are issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI). The IVS aims to standardize valuation practices across various industries and asset classes within India.

International Valuation Standards (IVSC)

The International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC) issues the International Valuation Standards (IVS). These standards are widely recognized and adopted globally, providing a framework for consistent valuation practices across different jurisdictions.

Key Components of Valuation Standards

Scope and Applicability

IVS

 Applicable primarily to financial reporting, taxation, and regulatory compliance within India.

IVSC

 Applies to a broader range of valuation purposes, including financial reporting, mergers and acquisitions, litigation, and strategic planning.

Valuation Approaches

Both IVS and IVSC recognize three main approaches to valuation:

Market Approach

 Based on comparable market transactions.

Income Approach

 Based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

Cost Approach

 Based on the replacement or reproduction cost of an asset.

Professional Requirements

IVS

 Requires valuers to be registered with the  IBBI and adhere to their professional codes of conduct.

IVSC

 Emphasizes the need for professional competence and ethical standards but does not mandate specific registration, allowing for broader professional discretion.

Key Differences Between Indian Valuation Rules and International Standards

Regulatory Framework

Indian Valuation Rules

 Governed by the Companies Act, 2013, and the rules issued by ICAI and IBBI. The regulatory environment is stringent, with specific requirements for different types of valuations.

International Valuation Standards

 More principles-based and less prescriptive. The IVSC provides a framework that can be adapted to various local regulations.

Methodology and Assumptions

IVS

 Often more prescriptive regarding the methods and assumptions that should be used in specific contexts, such as insolvency and bankruptcy proceedings.

IVSC

 Offers flexibility, allowing valuers to choose appropriate methods and assumptions based on the circumstances of each valuation assignment.

Disclosure Requirements

IVS

 Emphasizes detailed disclosure of valuation assumptions, methodologies, and limitations, particularly for financial reporting purposes.

IVSC

 Requires transparency but is less prescriptive about the extent of disclosures, focusing on the materiality and relevance of the information provided.

Compliance and Enforcement

IVS

 Compliance is mandatory for registered valuers, with enforcement mechanisms in place through  IBBI.

IVSC

 Compliance is voluntary, relying on professional bodies and market participants to uphold standards.

Similarities Between Indian Valuation Rules and International Standards

Objective of Valuation

Both sets of standards aim to ensure that valuations are:

Transparent 

Clear and understandable to all stakeholders.

Consistent

 Comparable across different periods and entities.

Reliable

 Based on sound methodologies and accurate data.

Ethical Considerations

Both IVS and IVSC emphasize the importance of ethical conduct, requiring valuers to act with integrity, objectivity, and professional competence.

While Indian Valuation Standards and International Valuation Standards share common goals and fundamental principles, they differ in their regulatory frameworks, prescriptiveness, and enforcement mechanisms. Understanding these differences is essential for valuers operating in a global context, ensuring compliance with local regulations while adhering to internationally recognized best practices. The convergence of these standards over time could enhance the reliability and comparability of valuations across borders, benefiting global financial markets and investors.